Superduper speech therapy trial#
We felt strongly that resolving this issue before trial was important to protecting our clinical network, who we believe have always acted with good intentions.” The complaint primarily related to individuals privately uploading materials for use in their online therapy sessions with children with special needs. We respect the rights of all publishers and have continued to make improvements to our platform to prevent the uploading and sharing of content without permission.
This was the right decision for PresenceLearning and our providers, allowing us to maintain our focus on serving the children who need us. “We are pleased that our offer of judgment was accepted, resolving all allegations and ending the disruption of litigation prior to a trial. PresenceLearning declined an interview request today but sent the following statement to THE Journal via email: “We were shocked to learn PresenceLearning had thousands of Super Duper custom illustrations, photos, and text-based content in its digital library.” “We have worked very hard for 36 years to create unique, fun, and colorful products to help children with speech and language delays, developmental learning disabilities, and autism, improve their lives,” Super Duper President Sharon Webber said in a statement. In its complaint, Super Duper also accused PresenceLearning of unfair competition through its use of SD materials in numerous marketing and advertising promotions to create the false impression that Super Duper had sponsored and approved of Presence’s services. So Super Duper was basically able to shortcut having to take the case to trial, because the defendant capitulated and gave our client what it wanted: a judgment that PresenceLearning should not have done what it did, together with fair compensation.” “Frankly, the result was exactly what my client was looking for.
“The way this works, the offer of judgment basically is a tool that allows defendants to say, ‘All right, we give up, and we're going to make you a proposal that we think is fair,’” Weinberger said. The judgment was offered by PresenceLearning after about a year and a half of contested litigation, said Super Duper’s attorney James Weinberger told THE Journal today. The court also ordered PresenceLearning to permanently delete all copies of all works owned by Super Duper that were on PresenceLearning’s platform, which included 363 different titles owned by Super Duper the complaint filed by Super Duper stated that copyright management information had been intentionally removed from at least 140 of those titles. District Court Southern District of New York.
Superduper speech therapy plus#
Super Duper, which has published original educational material for PreK–5 children since 1986 with an emphasis in content for use in speech therapy, special education, and occupational therapy, will receive $3.25 million from PresenceLearning, plus legal fees to be determined, according to the judgment finalized Monday in U.S. Lawsuit Claimed PresenceLearning Platform Illegally Included Hundreds of SD-Owned Titles That Must Be RemovedĪ federal judge in New York this week approved a judgment against PresenceLearning, provider of online special education and therapy services for K–12 schools, in a copyright and trademark infringement lawsuit brought by a competitor, Super Duper Inc. Ed Tech Providers PresenceLearning Ordered to Pay Super Duper $3.25M in Copyright and Trademark Infringement Suit
0 kommentar(er)
